Isnin, 5 Mac 2012

12 di bukit raja - Google Blog Search

12 di bukit raja - Google Blog Search

Altantuya murder: Court's 70-page judgment out | MoCS

Posted: 05 Mar 2012 08:41 PM PST

By Hafiz Yatim

In the full judgment of the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder trial, the presiding judge extensively describes how the Mongolian translator had threatened third accused Abdul Razak Baginda, and why the court accepted the political analyst's affidavit as part of the evidence leading to his acquittal.

Shah Alam High Court judge Mohd Zaki Md Yasin in his judgment noted that Razak's affidavit dated Jan 5, 2007 was provided by the prosecution before it closed its case.

In his 70-page judgment obtained by Malaysiakini, Zaki classified Razak's affidavit, which forms a major portion of the judgment, as "not part and parcel of the police investigation process" but governed under the Oaths and Affirmations Act.

razak baginda acquitted 311008 12Hence, the judge ruled, the affidavit provided by the prosecution must be given its due weight as was given to the rest of the evidence from the prosecution.

Initially in the trial, only portions of the affidavit were admitted as evidence, including Razak's admission to having had a relationship with Altantuya, whom he met in November 2004.

However, the political analyst said he ended his relationship with the Mongolian woman sometime in August 2005.

Razak also stated that Altantuya demanded money from him and blackmailed him as a result of "the relationship".

Sometime in April 2006, Razak said in his affidavit he told Altantuya that he would not bow to her blackmail as he was not afraid of an expose of their relationship.

"Furthermore, I do not want to continue paying to her. From that day onwards, she continued to harass me via phone and letter. Sometime in August 2006, she threatened to come to my office," Razak states in his affidavit.

Altantuya was murdered sometime between 10pm on Oct 19, 2006 and 1am the next day in a jungle clearing near Kuala Lumpur, at Lot 16735, Mukim Bukit Raja, Shah Alam.

Altantuya taken away for 'interrogation'

razak baginda acquitted 311008 11While Razak was acquitted, two others charged jointly with him, Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri and Corporal Sirul Azhar Umar, were found guilty.

Justice Zaki noted that Razak in his affidavit stated that the two police special forces officers had taken Altantuya to the police station for her to be interrogated on the fateful day.

"Now, can these parts of the said affidavit be ignored or rejected? It is my finding that in the absence of any rebuttal evidence against them, coupled with the fact that there is no legal onus that lies upon the third accused (Razak) to rebut any statutory presumptions, there is clearly, to my mind, no reason for them to be ignored and rejected," the judge said.

Having perused the contents of the affidavit, the evidence corroborated by private investigator P Balasubramaniam, Altantuya's cousin Burmaa Oyuchimeg, L/Cpl Rohaniza Roslan – girlfriend of the accused Azilah – and Razak's secretary Siti Aishah Mohd Azlan have clearly negated and nullified the act of abetment as alleged against Razak, added Zaki.

"I have no reason to disagree with Razak. The averment about threat and blackmailing is corroborated by the threatening letters the deceased sent to the political analyst.

"Altantuya herself admitted to it when she wrote on a note found by Burmaa, 'Yes maybe I did mistake to bother him to blackmail him'," the judge said.

Razak may have motive to kill Altantuya but…

In acquitting Razak on Dec 31, 2008, the High Court judge had said the court was not prepared to call the political analyst to make his defence.

"In my view, once the essential elements of abetment that is by instigation, by conspiracy and aiding and in the context of this case, the death of Altantuya, is not proven on the basis of a prima facie evidence, any other inferences and doubts that may have arisen must be resolved as is trite in favour of the accused person.

"It is not for the court to call for the defence merely to clear or clarify such doubts. Even if Razak can be inferred as having had any motive in the light of all the blackmailing letters of the deceased, it cannot be made a basis for conviction of him without direct or circumstantial evidence of his participation in any manner in the commissioning of offence," the judgment states.

p balasubramaniam private investigator altantuya murder caseThe court also noted that Balasubramaniam (right), the private investigator hired by Razak, had also testified that Razak had no idea where Altantuya was when the private investigator had handed Altantuya over to Azilah in front of Razak's house on the day of the murder.

Balasubramaniam had said that he met Razak at his office on Oct 20, 2006, and asked which police station Altantuya was taken to.

However, Razak asked Balasubramiam to guess for himself, and Balasubramaniam then said it could be Travers police station or the Special Branch lock-up at Jalan Ipoh, the judgment said.

Portions from Razak's affidavit reproduced

The judge also reproduced portions of Razak's affidavit in his judgment.

Paragraph 25: Although I appointed Balasubramaniam following the disturbance from the deceased on me and my family continued, I decided to seek additional help from DSP Musa Safri whom I knew from my dealings with the Malaysia Strategic Research Centre.

(Musa was then Deputy Prime Minister Najib Razak's chief of staff and aide-de-camp).

Paragraph 26: "I asked Musa to help put up a police box at my home, where I stayed with my family, wanting assistance from the police to send a patrol car to patrol the vicinity, and to introduce me to one of the police officers who works at IPD (police district headquarters) Brickfields."

Paragraph27: DSP Musa informs me that he will introduce a police officer to me.

Paragraph 28: On Oct 16, 2006, Balasubramaniam suggested that Altantuya be deported from Malaysia. One Dhiren Norendra and Razak sternly rejected Balasubramaniam's proposal.

Paragraph 29: "On the morning of Oct 17, 2006, Altantuya came to my house where she tried to meet me. Her presence was known by my wife, Mazlinda Makhzan. I was not in the house at that time."

Paragraph 30: "On the night of Oct 17, while I was at home with my family, there was a disturbance outside the house."

Paragraph 31: "I immediately contacted Musa, but he was uncontactable." Razak then asked Balasubramaniam and Dhiren to help. A police patrol car arrived and resolved the commotion. "I did not lodge a police report on the first commotion."

Paragraph 32: "Musa informed me that he found a police officer to assist and help me deal with the disturbance."

Paragraph 33: "I met Azilah at my office and sought his help to patrol in the vicinity of my house. I gave him my house address, my father's name, Altantuya's name and Hotel Malaya (this is based on information given by Balasubramaniam). I also informed Azilah that Balasubramaniam is a private investigator.

"Before Azilah left my office, he asked me to inform him if Altantuya continued to disturb or cause commotion to me or my family."

Paragraph 35: "On Oct 19, Balasubramaniam called me and informed me that there is a second commotion (caused by Altantuya) outside my house. At that time, I and my family were outside, and so I proceeded to call Azilah."

Paragraph 37: "Balasubramaniam told me there were three plainclothes police personnel who arrived in an unmarked car and took Altantuya away. I believe the officers took Altantuya to the police station where she was interrogated."

Paragraph 38: "On Oct 20, I went to the Deputy Prime Minister's (Najib's) office on an official matter and there I met Musa. In my meeting with Musa, I asked what happened following the second commotion and Musa told me that Azilah did not say anything.

"I asked Musa again several days later, either by phone or by meeting him, and Musa's response was the same."

The Court of Appeal is scheduled to hold case management on Friday to set a date to hear the appeal filed by both Azilah and Sirul against the murder conviction.

The case has been pending for two years while awaiting the completion of the written judgment by Zaki. - Mkini


12 di bangi - Google Blog Search

12 di bangi - Google Blog Search

[PIC] Stesen Kuasa Elektrik Terbakar <b>di Bangi</b>

Posted: 01 Mar 2012 09:37 AM PST

12 di petaling jaya - Google Blog Search

12 di petaling jaya - Google Blog Search

Pemandu lori ditemui mati ditikam <b>di Petaling Jaya</b> |

Posted: 15 Feb 2012 06:50 PM PST

[unable to retrieve full-text content]PETALING JAYA: Seorang pemandu lori ditemui mati dengan satu tikaman di sebuah rumah pangsa di PJS 1/52, di sini, pada jam 3 pagi tadi.

12 di sabak bernam - Google Blog Search

12 di sabak bernam - Google Blog Search

Ceramah PR <b>di sabak bernam</b> : Memang benar tak ramai semalam <b>...</b>

Posted: 26 Jan 2012 10:47 PM PST

Ini gambar aku sendiri. Ini pengalaman aku sendiri. Korang jangan spin larh weh puak2 pakatan pembangkang. Cubalah menjadi orang yang menerima hakikat dan realiti. Menipu tak menjadikan ko lebih baik daripada bn. Ramai ke tak ramai ke time orang berceramah bukan isu. 
Isu nya ialah sejauh mana apa yang disampaikan kepada para hadirin yang hadir ke ceramah malam tadi dapat disebarkan dan disampaikan secara meluas kepada rakyat kebanyakkan di malaysia. Ibarat facebook dan twitter yang ada button share dan retweet. Apakah manusia2 yang hadir ke ceramah semalam boleh share dan retweet balik apa yang disampaikan oleh penceramah2 malam tadi?
Hanya ada 3 penceramah yang bawa topik relevant bagi aku semalam. 
1. Yb dap Ng suee lim <-- dia memang lawak. Aku asyik tergelak2 je.. pernah tengok dia berceramah di youtube tapi rupanya depan2 dia lagi lawak.
2. Prof Aziz bari <-- penuh dengan fakta dan keterangan.
3. Yb zuraidah <-- memperincikan isu nfc.
Harus di ingat, relevant bagi aku bukan bererti relevant bagi ko. Begitu juga sebaliknya. Tidak relevant bagi aku bukan bererti tidak relevant bagi ko juga. Oleh kerana aku online 24 jam maka banyak berita2 yang aku lebih tahu berbanding dengan orang2 yang tak online.
Mereka ketinggalan banyak isu dan point2 yang penting. Jadi mungkin ini juga sebab nya ada di antara penceramah politik yang ulang balik apa yang aku dah tahu ketika berceramah. Ini berbeza setiap di antara kita disini.
Yang lain2 termasuk dsai sekalipun hanya bawa isu2 yang dah aku ketahui. Azmin ali haram nampak batang hidung walhal poster terpampang gambar dia. Kalau tak jadi datang bagitau larh. Minta maaf ka apa ka. Maybe gak jurucakap dah minta maaf masa aku merayau2 time ceramah tue.. tak pasti pula aku. Kalau dah minta maaf lupakan sahaja, kalau tak minta maaf memang suwey. Jangan buat poster tayang muka kalau takmo datang.
Bukanlah kehadiran dia penting sangat tapi bila dah tayang muka at least dia dah bagi hint bahawa dia nak hadir. Tak salah pun kalau dia ada hal dan taknak hadir tapi at least sebagai adat sopan santun, bagitau orang bahawa dia sekian2 neh ada hal sekian2 neh. 
Benda neh nampak kecik tapi dari sekecik2 neh larh.. ia boleh tawan ahti orang. Macam isu air. Nampak mudah dan murah tapi sekecik2 neh larh yang orang rasa dan nikmati secara bulanan dan akhirnya orang akan hargai.
PR kepada azmin elok belajar benda neh. Tiada istilah bodek dalam kamus rakyat macam aku. Sorry. Gambar2 ketika ceramah sedang berlangsung.
                               nota : gambar di atas neh di ambil pada jam tepat 9 malam.
Ya. Ini gambar dari belakang. Ketika tiga orang penceramah politik berceramah aku lepak belakang amek angin. Best. Stadium mini neh besar. Boleh memuatkan lebih ramai orang lagi. 
Ini pula pandangan dari sisi depan. Time neh aku pergi depan nak amek gambar. Time neh yb zuraidah tengah memberikan ceramah politik ;

                                                           Dsai hadir dengan paluan kompang.
Memang tak ramai. Sepatutnya boleh memuatkan lebih ramai orang lagi. 
Okey, kat depan memang ramai orang. Orang2 yang duduk kat kerusi stadium depan, tepi memang penuh. Yang duduk kat kerusi belakang tak penuh tapi orang masih ramai. Walaupun stadium tue boleh memuatkan lebih ramai orang tapi jumlah kehadiran pada malam semalam adalah amat baik. Kenapa?
1. Ia di anjurkan di negeri pr. So rakyat di sana sering berpeluang pergi ke ceramah2 pr. Walaupun demikian, ia masih mendapat sambutan orang ramai meskipun tidak memenuhkan stadium tetapi berjaya menyaratkan stadium dengan jumlah hadirin yang ramai.
2. Ia di anjurkan pada hari bekerja. Esoknya [hari neh] ramai orang bekerja. Tapi dorang sanggup datang dan dengar ceramah lepas isyak sampai ke 11.50 malam. Biasanya time neh tidur lagi bagus. Jumlah yang hadir semalam memang ramai. Macam aku cakap tadi. Ia tak memenuhi ruangan stadium tapi masih berjaya memadatkan stadium.  Macam esoknya cuti pula.
3. YB zuraidah cakap sabak bernam ialah kubu kuat umno. Aku macam pelik sikit bila dia cakap macam tue. Kalau benar sabak bernam kubu kuat umno apahal ramai yang datang semalam? Mana ada bas dari luar walaupun aku sendiri datang dari luar selangor [perak]. Kebanyakkan rakyat [focus disini] yang hadir berceramah adalah dari kawasan sekitar.

Kalau sungguh sabak bernam neh kubu kuat umno, jumlah hadirin semalam adalah lebih dari memberangsangkan. Pasal kalau ko berada di kawasan kubu kuat sesuatu parti, berjaya mengumpulkan orang tempatan sehingga memenuhi lebih daripada separuh kawasan stadium, ini memang baik. 
Apatah lagi suasana semalam tiada provoke memprovoke daripada geng2 umno. Maybe masih tersentak dengan insiden samseng jalan kebun kowt. Apa pun tanpa polis, kawalan yang bagus dari unit amal pas sentiasa no 1.
4. Banyak peniaga2 habis jualan nya terutamanya makanan dan minuman. Clear.  Minuman larh yang paling laris. Ini bukti orang memang ramai semalam walaupun tak berjaya memenuhi ruangan stadium tapi still berjaya memadatkan stadium. 
Aku tak reti anggar jumlah hadirin semalam. Tapi lebih dari separuh kawasan stadium [bukan kira jumlah kerusi] memang penuh dengan orang ramai. Apa yang perlu pr focus dalam setiap kempen2 neh, bila dah berjaya collect orang ramai macam neh di satu tempat, edarkanlah leaflet pasal penyelewengan. 
Kalau boleh collect derma, takan tak boleh edar risalah penyelewengan? Photostat baru berapa? Kejayaan datang dengan usaha. Aku buat blog neh pun zero2. Pembaca yang bagi duit bila klik iklan. No iklan, no money tapi blog still jalan sebab penyelewengan tak pernah berhenti.
Jadi, biarlah bersusah2 sedikit asalkan kita boleh banteras penyelewengan supaya sesama kita boleh sama2 senang kelak. Owh yer, sebelum aku terlupa. Tak silap aku ada orang umno yang isytiharkan sokong pr semalam di ceramah neh. Malahan dia akan bawa lebih ramai lagi ahli2 umno masuk ke pr selepas neh. Bai.
Ameno : Pas neh aku nak pergi ceramah najib arh pula.. muahaha.. agak2 ramai tak macam neh? Dengar citer hari neh di lumut..